<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ecwwblog.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecwwblog.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecwwblog.org</link>
	<description>The Episcopal Church in Western Washington forum for web and social media resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media and a Safe Church by PAMELA RW KANDT</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/10/06/social-media-and-a-safe-church/comment-page-1/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>PAMELA RW KANDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=392#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>Our parish&#039;s social media is conducted strictly by individuals who have earned a leadership position and are trusted to handle all church communications. Transparency and accountability are a given. Since social media involves our youth, all adult communicators must have &quot;Safeguarding God&#039;s Children&quot; training and will take the Safe Church training once it becomes available in our diocese.

Some basic rules:

1) No one shall have one-on-one electronic contact with a juvenile parish member that does not include a cc: to another adult leader and, preferably, their parents as well.  This is especially important for text messaging. 

2) Adult social media communicators will monitor daily comments, postings, etc. that affect our parish electronic mediums. Any inappropriate behavior will be addressed immediately.

3) If it cannot be said publicly in the middle of the parish hall, then it should not be said privately.

4) Think thrice, send once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our parish&#8217;s social media is conducted strictly by individuals who have earned a leadership position and are trusted to handle all church communications. Transparency and accountability are a given. Since social media involves our youth, all adult communicators must have &#8220;Safeguarding God&#8217;s Children&#8221; training and will take the Safe Church training once it becomes available in our diocese.</p>
<p>Some basic rules:</p>
<p>1) No one shall have one-on-one electronic contact with a juvenile parish member that does not include a cc: to another adult leader and, preferably, their parents as well.  This is especially important for text messaging. </p>
<p>2) Adult social media communicators will monitor daily comments, postings, etc. that affect our parish electronic mediums. Any inappropriate behavior will be addressed immediately.</p>
<p>3) If it cannot be said publicly in the middle of the parish hall, then it should not be said privately.</p>
<p>4) Think thrice, send once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media and a Safe Church by Rev. Kurt Huber</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/10/06/social-media-and-a-safe-church/comment-page-1/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. Kurt Huber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 23:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=392#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>The Diocese of CT has &quot;Safe Church guidelines for social media&quot; - you can find the pdf here:

http://www.ctepiscopal.org/images/customer-files//SocialMediaGuidelinesbooklet.pdf

Rev. Kurt Huber
St. Peter&#039;s, Monroe, CT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Diocese of CT has &#8220;Safe Church guidelines for social media&#8221; &#8211; you can find the pdf here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ctepiscopal.org/images/customer-files//SocialMediaGuidelinesbooklet.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ctepiscopal.org/images/customer-files//SocialMediaGuidelinesbooklet.pdf</a></p>
<p>Rev. Kurt Huber<br />
St. Peter&#8217;s, Monroe, CT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How wired do you want to be? by admin</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/08/29/how-wired-do-you-want-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=376#comment-2558</guid>
		<description>I like the concept of &quot;Fixed&quot; vs. &quot;Dynamic&quot;.  Again, good points on your part.  In some ways, smart phone distractions are no different than daydreaming, it&#039;s just that everyone else can see it!  I have tried to come up with some ideas on how to minimize the distractions.  The Kindle may be the best solution as it is not a multi-tasking device.  Possibly an iPad could be programmed to only do the service program on powerup (church&#039;s iPad, not anyone bringing one in, of course).

You&#039;re right, the distraction factor is huge.  I know when I took some classes earlier this year, everyone had laptops and were taking notes on them.  At least they APPEARED to be doing that.  Some were surfing, some checking email, some tweeting.  As an instructor or if you were presenting a project, you never know what is going on in those computers.  You just trust that they are listening to what you have to say and are being responsible.  We may have to have the same attitude with smart phones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept of &#8220;Fixed&#8221; vs. &#8220;Dynamic&#8221;.  Again, good points on your part.  In some ways, smart phone distractions are no different than daydreaming, it&#8217;s just that everyone else can see it!  I have tried to come up with some ideas on how to minimize the distractions.  The Kindle may be the best solution as it is not a multi-tasking device.  Possibly an iPad could be programmed to only do the service program on powerup (church&#8217;s iPad, not anyone bringing one in, of course).</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, the distraction factor is huge.  I know when I took some classes earlier this year, everyone had laptops and were taking notes on them.  At least they APPEARED to be doing that.  Some were surfing, some checking email, some tweeting.  As an instructor or if you were presenting a project, you never know what is going on in those computers.  You just trust that they are listening to what you have to say and are being responsible.  We may have to have the same attitude with smart phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How wired do you want to be? by Brad Howard</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/08/29/how-wired-do-you-want-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2557</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=376#comment-2557</guid>
		<description>Good question. I think a book differs from a smart device in that a book is &quot;fixed.&quot; While people may be compartmentalized when they look at a book during worship, they are at least literally on the same page. A smart device, by contrast, isn&#039;t fixed: it&#039;s a dynamic portal to anything online anywhere.

Having said that, I think the church is way behind on using modern technology to connect with those of working age.

The barcode idea is very good idea from a technical and environmental standpoint. However, the danger of inviting congregants to use their devices for one purpose is the near certainty that congregants will then use them for other purposes during the service: texting, emailing, blogging, facebooking, IMing, youtubing, etc.

One way to use smart phones to promote church growth and outreach would be to encourage congregants to &quot;check in&quot; on their social networking sites before they turn off their devices. Maybe a dignified sign at the entrance suggesting that people &quot;Check in, then check out. Please turn off electronic devices during the service.&quot;

Technology only moves one way, and that is forward, so I agree that it will find its way into worship one way or another. Perhaps offline electronic readers in pews would be a middle ground for those who find books an anachronism. It would be an initial expense for the church, but think of the saved costs in paper and postage, not to mention conserved natural resources. As these things become cheaper that may very well become a cost-effective no brainer way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. I think a book differs from a smart device in that a book is &#8220;fixed.&#8221; While people may be compartmentalized when they look at a book during worship, they are at least literally on the same page. A smart device, by contrast, isn&#8217;t fixed: it&#8217;s a dynamic portal to anything online anywhere.</p>
<p>Having said that, I think the church is way behind on using modern technology to connect with those of working age.</p>
<p>The barcode idea is very good idea from a technical and environmental standpoint. However, the danger of inviting congregants to use their devices for one purpose is the near certainty that congregants will then use them for other purposes during the service: texting, emailing, blogging, facebooking, IMing, youtubing, etc.</p>
<p>One way to use smart phones to promote church growth and outreach would be to encourage congregants to &#8220;check in&#8221; on their social networking sites before they turn off their devices. Maybe a dignified sign at the entrance suggesting that people &#8220;Check in, then check out. Please turn off electronic devices during the service.&#8221;</p>
<p>Technology only moves one way, and that is forward, so I agree that it will find its way into worship one way or another. Perhaps offline electronic readers in pews would be a middle ground for those who find books an anachronism. It would be an initial expense for the church, but think of the saved costs in paper and postage, not to mention conserved natural resources. As these things become cheaper that may very well become a cost-effective no brainer way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How wired do you want to be? by admin</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/08/29/how-wired-do-you-want-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2556</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=376#comment-2556</guid>
		<description>You make some good points.  There does need to be a balance in this.  Doing it because the technology is available isn&#039;t the right reason.  I remember a time where everyone was reading the service out of the prayer book, which while it is participatory, still compartmentalizes the individual to some extent.  How does a book differ from a smart device?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points.  There does need to be a balance in this.  Doing it because the technology is available isn&#8217;t the right reason.  I remember a time where everyone was reading the service out of the prayer book, which while it is participatory, still compartmentalizes the individual to some extent.  How does a book differ from a smart device?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How wired do you want to be? by Brad Howard</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/08/29/how-wired-do-you-want-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2555</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=376#comment-2555</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting and very important issue.

Smartphone use in worship has both good and bad potential. The potential good is that people use their smartphones/ipads for just about everything. They are a great way of conveying data, and this should be harnessed to our advantage.

The potential bad is that they can contribute to the atomization of society, and worship is a communal-- which is to say participatory-- ritual. As people become atomized, they participate less. Staring at a smartphone in a room full of other people staring at their smartphones isn&#039;t communal, it&#039;s parallel play.

A smartphone is essentially a hand-help video feed. We would do well to consider what is being activated in our psyches as we shift from (left brain dominant) alphabetical communication, which has been the norm of &quot;Western Civilization&quot; for the past few thousand years, back towards (right brain dominant) pictorial communication, particularly in the context of religion.

My two cents worth: whatever we do, let us beware the absence of context inherent in any matrix.

I recommend that decision-makers read &quot;The Alphabet Versus The Goddess&quot; by Leonard Shlain and &quot;Psychology and Western Religion&quot; by Carl Jung for insight into the implications of incorporating technology into ancient ritual.

Yes, change is inevitable. But if it is not undertaken consciously we risk unforeseen and unintended consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting and very important issue.</p>
<p>Smartphone use in worship has both good and bad potential. The potential good is that people use their smartphones/ipads for just about everything. They are a great way of conveying data, and this should be harnessed to our advantage.</p>
<p>The potential bad is that they can contribute to the atomization of society, and worship is a communal&#8211; which is to say participatory&#8211; ritual. As people become atomized, they participate less. Staring at a smartphone in a room full of other people staring at their smartphones isn&#8217;t communal, it&#8217;s parallel play.</p>
<p>A smartphone is essentially a hand-help video feed. We would do well to consider what is being activated in our psyches as we shift from (left brain dominant) alphabetical communication, which has been the norm of &#8220;Western Civilization&#8221; for the past few thousand years, back towards (right brain dominant) pictorial communication, particularly in the context of religion.</p>
<p>My two cents worth: whatever we do, let us beware the absence of context inherent in any matrix.</p>
<p>I recommend that decision-makers read &#8220;The Alphabet Versus The Goddess&#8221; by Leonard Shlain and &#8220;Psychology and Western Religion&#8221; by Carl Jung for insight into the implications of incorporating technology into ancient ritual.</p>
<p>Yes, change is inevitable. But if it is not undertaken consciously we risk unforeseen and unintended consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How wired do you want to be? by admin</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/08/29/how-wired-do-you-want-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2549</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=376#comment-2549</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback.  As Meredith Gould said in an earlier comment, the culture change will take time, but change however it comes will be inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback.  As Meredith Gould said in an earlier comment, the culture change will take time, but change however it comes will be inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How wired do you want to be? by Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/08/29/how-wired-do-you-want-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=376#comment-2548</guid>
		<description>As an iPad owner and a Eucharistic Minister, I am so close to bringing my unit up to the lectern to read from. One practical use, I can have an enlarged print version to read from as my middle-age eyes cannnot read the regular lectionary even with reading glasses. I also use the app iBCP and find it wonderful for my morning meditations.

On the other hand, I understand the point of view of the elderly but in my former post as Parish Admin, I created all-inclusive bulletins using Rite Stuff and Rite Song and all church goers including the seniors and non-cradle Episcopalians loved using these large print bulletins. The pew books are becoming obsolete one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an iPad owner and a Eucharistic Minister, I am so close to bringing my unit up to the lectern to read from. One practical use, I can have an enlarged print version to read from as my middle-age eyes cannnot read the regular lectionary even with reading glasses. I also use the app iBCP and find it wonderful for my morning meditations.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I understand the point of view of the elderly but in my former post as Parish Admin, I created all-inclusive bulletins using Rite Stuff and Rite Song and all church goers including the seniors and non-cradle Episcopalians loved using these large print bulletins. The pew books are becoming obsolete one way or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How wired do you want to be? by Denny Allman</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/08/29/how-wired-do-you-want-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2546</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny Allman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=376#comment-2546</guid>
		<description>My God!  Next, you will be allowing the un-baptized to take communion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My God!  Next, you will be allowing the un-baptized to take communion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How wired do you want to be? by Ed Lovelady</title>
		<link>http://ecwwblog.org/2011/08/29/how-wired-do-you-want-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2545</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Lovelady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecwwblog.org/?p=376#comment-2545</guid>
		<description>I love technology, but it seems that most our our congregations are just now moving into the 20th century with printed service materials.  The few attempts I&#039;ve experienced around the country with using technology in worship have been feeble at best.  It&#039;s also a generational thing, as many of our church goers are the generation who are just now learning how to use a cell phone.  I&#039;d like to see some serious work with our congregations to utilize technology from current web sites and electronic giving to multisensory worship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love technology, but it seems that most our our congregations are just now moving into the 20th century with printed service materials.  The few attempts I&#8217;ve experienced around the country with using technology in worship have been feeble at best.  It&#8217;s also a generational thing, as many of our church goers are the generation who are just now learning how to use a cell phone.  I&#8217;d like to see some serious work with our congregations to utilize technology from current web sites and electronic giving to multisensory worship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

